Blog

Vic Keegan: Samuel Pepys and Seething Lane

London is blessed with small spaces covering up layers of history. They are often former plague pit sites, though few are as intriguing as the oasis of greenery in the City shown above, which would fetch a small fortune if sold to developers. This was the land of Samuel Pepys, subject of the bust on the right.

Pepys lived, wrote, worked, played and worshiped in the area covered by this photo for 12 years from 1660 after he was appointed Clerk of the Acts, a position originally called the Keeper of the King’s Ports and Galleys. It lies between Seething Lane and Crutched Friars. Pepys is also buried in this area, in St Olave’s church, along with his wife Elizabeth. The spire of the church can be seen peeping up in the background of the photo.

“Seething” didn’t mean boiling with rage in those days but “full of chaff”, the chaff in question generated by the nearby corn market in Fenchurch Street. Crutched Friars is a corruption of cruciferi and referred to the crosses sewn on the habits of the mendicant friars in the adjacent monastery, after whom the road is named.

Pepys lived in a dwelling on the left side of the newly created Navy Office, shown below, working night and day – including the nine years he wrote his famous diary – as he steadily rose in seniority, reforming the navy as he went along, not least by opposing the rapacity of contractors. He is rightly thought to be one of the founders of the modern navy.

Pasted image 0 2

The Pepys diaries are a unique eyewitness account of how one man lived in an era of huge political and social upheaval, taking in the Restoration of Charles II in 1660, the Great Plague of 1665, the Great Fire of London the following year, and the Second Anglo-Dutch War.

The 1665 plague was the darkest period for Seething Lane. It is reckoned that an astonishing 300 plague victims were buried in the churchyard, which led Pepys to remark: ‘‘It frighted me indeed to go through the church…to see so many graves lie so high upon the churchyard, where many people have been buried of the plague.” It also “frighted” Charles Dickens, who named the church “Sir Ghastly Grim” because of three skulls which still hang over its side entrance.

One of Pepys’s Seething Lane neighbours was Sir William Penn, whose amazing son, also named Willam Penn, was educated around the corner at All Hallows church. William Jnr went on to found the US state of Pennsylvania, which the Crown bestowed on him after Charles II’s death in lieu of debts the Crown owed his father. The younger Penn wanted to call it “Sylvania” after silvia, the Latin word for wood, but was persuaded to affix his surname to it instead.

Pepys saw the first flames of what was to become the Great Fire of London from this garden on 2 September, 1666, though he had to be woken up and told twice by his maid before realising the seriousness of it. He then had a good look round and rushed by water to the King in Whitehall to tell him that “unless his Majesty did command houses to be pulled down nothing could stop the fire”. Pepys added: “The King commanded me to go to my Lord Mayor…and command him to spare no houses, but to pull down before the fire every way”.

On Tuesday 4 September the diarist wrote: “Now begins the practice of blowing up of houses in Tower-streete, those next the Tower, which at first did frighten people more than anything, but it stopped the fire where it was done, it bringing down the houses to the ground in the same places they stood, and then it was easy to quench what little fire was in it, though it kindled nothing almost.”

When it looked as though the fire would sweep up Seething Lane, Pepys and Penn famously buried their best wine and Pepys favourite cheese, parmesan, in the garden. Who knows, maybe a bottle or two is still there.

Pepys is generally considered to be the greatest diarist in the English language, albeit accidentally, because he never intended his journals to be published, despite their containing absolutely invaluable first-hand accounts of what was happening in politics at the time. They were written in a code that wasn’t deciphered until 150 years after they were written and contained graphic details of his near-serial philandering, some of which was non-consensual.

These activities took place around the town but also in Pepys’s home, where he made approaches to some of the maids in his household. On one extraordinary occasion he was caught in the act by Elizabeth when having his hair combed by her companion Deb Willet. According to his diary entry of 25 October 25 1688 this “occasioned the greatest sorrow to me that ever I knew in this world, for my wife, coming up suddenly, did find me embracing the girl”.

Pasted image 0 1

Unsurprisingly, Pepy had an often turbulent relationship with his wife, but it was also a loving one. When she died suddenly of typhoid on 10 November 1669, aged 29, he was devastated, and the small sculpture he had installed in St Olave’s (photo above) in her memory can still be seen today.

The Navy Office was spared the Great Fire, only to be destroyed by another one seven years later, in 1673. It was rebuilt in 1674-5 but demolished in 1788 when the Navy Office moved to Somerset House. The site was then occupied by warehouses of the all powerful East India Company, but they too have disappeared, leaving just the Pepys bust to hint at the past of this historic City green space.

This is the third article in a series of 20 by Vic Keegan about locations of historical interest in the Eastern City part of the City of London, kindly supported by the EC BID, which serves that area. On London’s policy on “supported content” can be read here.

 

Categories: Culture, EC BID supported series

Sadiq Khan confirms he’s ‘ready to support’ new King in choice of location for Elizabeth statue

City Hall has today repeated that Sadiq Khan regards decisions about London locations for memorial statues of the late Elizabeth II are “for His Majesty the King and the Royal Family” to make and that he “stands ready to support the Royal Family in whatever their wishes are”, underlining that this includes “using the 4th plinth” in Trafalgar Square “if that is the Royal Family’s preference”.

The restatement of the Mayor’s stance follows false claims by some media organisations that Khan intends to stop a statue of the late Queen being put up in the square or wishes to prevent the 4th plinth, currently the platform for a series of contemporary art pieces, being used for that purpose.

Despite City Hall issuing a statement to the same effect yesterday, the right wing Talk TV channel claimed today on Twitter that “having a statue of the Queen on the fourth plinth of Trafalgar Square has been ruled out by Sadiq Khan” and its presenter Mike Graham said on air that Khan had said “she’s not worthy” of the setting. He added: “Don’t you dare tell us that you can’t have statue to the Queen in Trafalgar Square because the people of this country want it.”

Screenshot 2022 09 30 at 14.04.13

Graham provided no evidence of public preferences for where any statue of Elizabeth in the capital might be put, although one member of parliament, John Hayes, who represents the Lincolnshire seat of South Holland & The Deepings, suggested the Fourth Plinth in the House of Commons last week.

Yesterday, the hard right Daily Express falsely claimed that “a plan to commemorate the late Queen Elizabeth with a statue at Trafalgar Square” had been “snubbed” by Khan (headline below) and cited “calls” for a permanent one to go on the 4th plinth, but provided no information about any “plan” or “calls”. The same article quoted a spokesperson for the Mayor stating that “a statue of the Queen at a suitable location in London is a matter for the Royal Family to consider and, of course, the Greater London Authority stands ready to support them in their wishes.”

Screenshot 2022 09 30 at 14.05.07

The Fourth Plinth, which is in the north west corner of the square, stood empty for more than 150 years before becoming used for a rolling programme of contemporary works from 1999, initially commissioned by the Royal Society of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce with the support of its then chair, Prue Leith, and from 2003 by the Mayor of London’s Fourth Plinth Commission.

Although the Fourth Plinth has become well known, knowledgeable commentators have pointed out that it is overshadowed by Nelson’s Column and would not provide the prominence appropriate for a popular monarch who served in her role for 70 years.

Nicholas Boys Smith, director of Create Streets, who advises the government about architectural matters, has written that the Fourth Plinth “does not seem to rise to the occasion. Her Majesty would be paired with William IV on the opposite plinth and behind two Victorian generals. All are towered over by Lord Nelson. Placing Her Majesty behind two imperial panjandrums and on a par with one of her less illustrious predecessors does not seem sufficient”.

Nick Bowes, director of think tank Centre for London and formerly the Mayor’s policy director, has argued that a “statue on a plinth in the corner of Traf Sq isn’t befitting” and that a memorial might be built halfway down the The Mall, which could be renamed after Elizabeth and be closed to motor vehicles.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: News

Debbie Weekes-Bernard: New Survey of Londoners shows need for targeted cost-of-living support

Two-and-a-half years after the first Covid-19 national lockdown, who would have predicted we would be in the midst of another crisis – one affecting our ability to feel financially secure, to heat our homes and to afford basic necessities? After a lot of hard work and sacrifice we have emerged from the pandemic, but now face another uncertain winter due to the cost-of-living crisis.

The pandemic caused massive disruption to the lives of Londoners, and in order to recover from it positively we needed to understand how lives had been affected. That’s why the Greater London Authority commissioned its second Survey of Londoners, which took place at the end of 2021.

Unfortunately, as we were preparing to start fieldwork on this new survey, the cost-of-living crisis was beginning to emerge. So while our new survey has provided insight into the lives of Londoners after the initial phase of the Covid crisis, it hasn’t captured the effects of the emerging cost-of-living crisis. Despite this, it has given us valuable insights into the lives of over seven million adult Londoners at that point in time and can serve as a new baseline for the changes we are currently seeing in living standards.

The results from this new survey, taken nearly two years after the first lockdown, show that government support, in the form of protections like furlough and the Universal Credit uplift, helped to ensure overall financial hardship did not increase in London from the time of the first Survey of Londoners, covering 2018-19. However, inequalities grew, as improvements were largely driven by the financial situations of higher-income Londoners, compared with those on lower-incomes.

As a result of these findings, in early September, Sadiq Khan warned the incoming Prime Minister that a Covid-level of support would be required to help Londoners through the cost-of-living crisis. But crucially any further support would need to be far more targeted to ensure it helps those most in need. Initial signs from the new administration are not encouraging, with millions of pounds of unfunded borrowing to be used to transfer money from taxpayers at large to some of the most wealthy people in society.

The new survey notes that some of the groups hardest hit by the effects of the pandemic were much more likely to already be in financial hardship. The 2018-19 survey highlighted previous inequalities – namely, how disabled Londoners and single parents fared poorly on most, if not all, the survey’s economic precarity measures, along with Black Londoners. This latest survey finds that these groups of Londoners were again the most severely affected. In 2022, we started polling Londoners about their experiences of the cost-of-living crisis, and these groups of Londoners were, again, found to be the ones more likely to be struggling to make ends meet.

This continuing situation is undoubtedly a result of long-term structural inequalities which disadvantage minority groups, and demonstrate that there is still much to do. The London Recovery Board, a forum which brings together leaders from across London’s government, business and civil society, published its Building a Fairer City report earlier this year, committing us to a series of actions to help tackle inequalities. The results of the new survey add weight to our commitment.

An encouraging finding from the survey is that it demonstrates the resilience of Londoners and how, by the time it was being conducted, some of the critical issues facing Londoners had recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Londoners’ sense of belonging to the city, the local areas in which they live, and their wellbeing were back at levels recorded in 2018-19.

Sociability levels had not recovered fully, however. Social contact was one of the areas most affected by lockdown restrictions. People were not seeing their friends as often as back in 2018-19, and fewer Londoners reported spending time with their friends or family in general. In addition, Londoners’ participation in free-time activities had also been affected. For example, they were much less likely to have visited a museum or gallery recently, or to have attended a church, mosque or place of worship. The Recovery Board’s mental health and wellbeing mission will see wellbeing champions across the city, empowering individuals, to support not only their own wellbeing but also that of others, and reinforcing the connections we know are so important.

A headline findings report of the new survey have now been published. This goes into more detail about many different aspects of Londoners’ lives, and is required reading for anyone interested in improving life in London. We have also produced a shorter, more visual summary of the key findings, which is easier to digest. For those with an appetite for data, we have created a series of data tables to accompany the report, which provides further breakdowns for more groups of Londoners.

With the cost-of living-crisis now affecting our city and the whole country, the groups of Londoners previously highlighted (as well as some others) are in the worst possible positions to be able to stave off the increasing cost pressures facing them in 2022 and beyond. That is why we are calling for support targeted directly at those who need it the most to help them through this winter, prevent further inequalities, and ensuring we can build a better and more prosperous city for all Londoners.

Debbie Weekes-Bernard is Deputy Mayor for Communities and Social Justice. Follow her on Twitter. Image from Survey report.

Notes about the survey: It was a self-completion survey of 8,630 adults aged 16 and over living in London, and ran from November 2021 until February 2022. It used an online-first methodology, followed by paper questionnaires. The survey sample was drawn from addresses in the Postcode Address File database. After fieldwork had started, some restrictions were introduced due to the emergence of the Omicron variant. This may or may not have had some effect on the data, but caution should be applied when interpreting the results.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: Comment

Departing Andy Byford hails ‘just beautiful’ Elizabeth Line as revenue and reliability impress

Outgoing Transport for London chief Andy Byford yesterday signed off from his final meeting of the network’s Elizabeth Line committee with a paean to what he said was “the most amazing railway in the world”.

The Elizabeth Line opened under Byford’s watch in May this year, just in time for the royal platinum jubilee celebrations, and some 18 months after he took full control of the much-delayed and over-budget project in October 2020.

“It has been my absolute honour and privilege just to be associated with this railway,” the transit veteran said, thanking the TfL board “for backing me when I said we needed to bring this in house to drive it to the finishing line”.

Connecting Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east to Reading and Heathrow in the west via central London, and billed by TfL as “the most significant” addition to the capital’s transport network in a generation”, the Elizabeth line was “just beautiful”, Byford added. “It’s amazing. I don’t think it is hyperbole to say that.”

The project, originally called Crossrail, had been jointly overseen by TfL and the government until 2020, when escalating delays and cost overruns saw it at least two years behind schedule and some £4 billion over budget. At that point, as Centre for London chief executive and former City Hall adviser Nick Bowes said earlier this year, it “suddenly stopped being a joint project”.

“Blame and the job of finishing the thing became London’s problem,” he added. “Almost all the burden of extra costs was shifted to the city. To get it finished, London has had to mortgage itself.”

But if Whitehall insiders had harboured thoughts of ridding themselves of a poisoned chalice by giving full control of the project to TfL and the newly-appointed Byford, they would have been proved wrong, the committee heard.

Passenger numbers on the new line are consistently higher than budgeted for, regularly exceeding two million a week and coming in to date at 14 million more than expected, the committee heard – delivering £20 million more in fares than estimated and putting the line on track to break even next year.

Bond Street, the final new central London station on the line to open, will welcome its first passengers on 24 October in “another boost to London’s recovery from the pandemic”, and full seven-day through services from Reading and Heathrow to Abbey Wood and Shenfield to Paddington will run from 6 November. The line also had the highest reliability scores in the country, at 94.6%.

Byford confirmed that the project remains on target to come in under the final budget he inherited from the outgoing Crossrail board. “In summary,” he said, “despite many problems and issues to be resolved, we are in good shape. We’ve calmly got on with it.”

The commissioner will, though, not be in post to see the next steps for the line. Having fulfilled what some saw as a foolhardy pledge to finish the project with no further delays or cost overruns, he announced in a surprise statement just over a week ago that he will depart at the end of the month.

Budget pressures still remain, with the latest funding deal between TfL, City Hall and the government requiring an extra £48.5 million from mayoral funds to get the line completed, with no government cash on offer for further shortfalls, and TfL as a whole still on a tight rein, with spending plans agreed only through to March 2024.

The Mayor is already required to pay back £825 million borrowed from the Department for Transport for the project in 2020, and budget overruns have meant City Hall dipping into business rate monies and cash for infrastructure raised from developers which would otherwise have helped fund other projects.

But the Elizabeth Line funding model overall, a unique approach which saw capital costs shared between fare payers, national government, developers and businesses, could be a significant blueprint for future projects, the committee heard.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: News

Sadiq Khan summonsed to face London Assembly over resignation of Cressida Dick from Met

Sadiq Khan is to be forced to answer questions from London Assembly members (AMs) about his role in the resignation of Cressida Dick as Metropolitan Police commissioner earlier this year under legal powers deployed by the elected scrutiny body.

Members of the Assembly’s police and crime committee voted narrowly today to make us of the power to issue a summons notice, which makes it a criminal offence not to attend an Assembly meeting without providing a satisfactory excuse.

The committee, composed of four Conservative, four Labour, one Green and one Liberal Democrat AM voted by five to four to summons the Mayor to its meeting on 16 November, when it will ask him about the findings of the recently published review for the government of the circumstances of Dick’s departure by Tom Winsor, which was critical of Khan’s handling of the matter.

The four Tories were joined by Lib Dem Hina Bokhari, who was substituting for her Lib Dem colleague Caroline Pidgeon, in voting to immediately summons Khan, rather than simply issue him with an invitation to attend to meeting, which he would have been able to decline.

Khan reacted strongly against the findings of the review by Winsor, who was Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary until March of this year, complaining to the then Home Secretary Priti Patel that its draft findings were “clearly biased”.

Caroline Russell, the Green Party member of the committee, who joined Labour AMs in voting against issuing the summons, said she was “very keen to hear from the Mayor about his views on the Winsor report,” but felt it was “unnecessary to go straight to summons”. She added that she would have supported a summons had Khan declined an invitation to attend.

Committee deputy chair, Labour’s Unmesh Desai, said he believed the summonsing power “should be used wisely, carefully and properly”, and that not making an invitation first “would give the wrong impression that the Mayor doesn’t want to come”. He proposed instead inviting the Khan and only considering summonsing him if he did not accept within an agreed time period.

Russell’s position and the balance of committee votes suggest it is unlikely that the Mayor would have turned the invitation down, even if inclined to.

London Mayors have been often been summonsed to appear before AMs before, but this is the first time the power has been used in relation to the police and crime commissioner role that comes with the job, carried out through the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime.

Conservative group leader Susan Hall, who also chairs the police and crime committee, said the Winsor review raised important questions about the circumstances under which the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner stood down. We believe that, given the seriousness of the review’s findings, the Mayor needs to address the unanswered questions that have emerged.”

One of the Labour members was unable to vote as she attended the meeting remotely, but had the outcome been five-all Hall would have been expected to use her casting vote. Patel, Winsor and Dick are to be invited to the November meeting.

A spokesperson for the Mayor said: “The Mayor’s focus is on working with the new reforming Commissioner to build a safer London for everyone, rebuild trust and confidence in the police and support Sir Mark [Rowley] to drive through the urgent reforms and step change in culture and performance Londoners deserve. Londoners elected the Mayor to hold the Met Commissioner to account and that’s exactly what he has done. The Mayor makes no apology for demanding better for London and putting its interests first.”

Updated at 17:53.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: News

London MP Chris Philp struggles to defend government ‘mini budget’ in radio appearances

Croydon South MP Chris Philp was rebuked by two senior radio presenters this morning for his attempts to defend the government’s “mini-budget” in his capacity as right-hand man of Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng.

Appearing on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Philp who has been made Chief Secretary to the Treasury by new Prime Minister Liz Truss earlier this month, repeatedly failed to address presenter Mishal Hussain’s questions (from 2:10) about the effects of the government’s actions on the financial markets, and was called “pitiful” by LBC morning host Nick Ferrari when he attributed the collapse in the value of sterling to “moves in global financial markets” caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The mini-budget or, as the government called it, “fiscal event” last Friday was immediately followed by a plunge in the pound’s value and led to an emergency intervention yesterday by the Bank of England which warned that without it there would be “a material risk to UK financial stability“.

However, Philp refused to concede that these events were related to the government’s measures, failing to tell Hussain if it was his view that “everything’s going according to plan” or whether he and the government had foreseen the reaction to them “and are therefore comfortable with it” before Hussain interrupted him, saying “you’re not addressing what I’m asking about” and pointing out that “what is happening is frightening for many people”. Philp replied by saying “volatility” has been experienced in other countries and refused to accept that recent problems had been “accelerated by your actions”.

Ferrari, having quoted scathing assessments of the mini-budget, which contained no mention of Ukraine, demanded that Philp “stop treating my listeners as fools” and said the crisis was down to “your bosses’s work” and needed to be changed, but Philp refused to accept responsibility, preferring to cite favourable responses by business organisations to some of the mini-budget’s measures rather than address its impacts.

Philp, who became Croydon South’s MP in 2015 and retained his seat with a majority of 12,339 in 2019, had claimed on Twitter on Friday that financial markets had responded enthusiastically to Kwarteng’s statement, but has since deleted the tweet.

Earlier this year Philp, when minister for technology and the digital economy with responsibility for combatting online disinformation, faced derision for refusing to distance himself from Boris Johnson’s false allegation in the House of Commons that opposition leader Keir Starmer had failed to prosecute the serial paedophile Jimmy Savile when he was Director of Public Prosecutions.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: News

The On London discussion. What next for Oxford Street and the West End?

With the nation’s economy in turmoil following a government quasi budget that placed considerable faith in the capital’s economy to power a “new era” of growth, how are the West End and its most famous avenue, Oxford Street, shaping up to the challenges they face? How can the need to renew its attractions for visitors be most productively reconciled with the often different priorities of West End residents, of whom there are more than is widely appreciated, not all of them wealthy?

Those were the big, difficult and very interesting issues addressed at yesterday’s online event for On London supporters – the third of the six that will be held this year – by panelists Geoff Barraclough, who is Labour-run Westminster Council’s cabinet member for planning and economic development, Dee Corsi, the interim chief executive of business group New West End Company, and Andrew Murray, a resident of Soho and a campaigner for improvements to his neighbourhood and its environs.

There was common ground that Oxford Street is in urgent need of what Corsi called “TLC”, with shared enthusiasm for measures to make the environment more green, navigable and welcoming, and shared concerns about some of the newer retail presences, notably certain clothing and souvenir emporia and the now notorious candy shops, which the council announced an initiative against last week.

‘The key problem with Oxford Street is it’s got the wrong kind of shops,” Barraclough said, citing the candy shops as “particularly wrong” and reporting that the council’s high profile efforts to enforce trading standards and “make it too embarrassing for landlords to have bad tenants” are having an effect, although “it’s like whack-a-mole”.

Murray mentioned the Marble Arch Mound, the well-meant but disastrous project of the previous, Conservative-run council administration aimed at drawing visitors back to the West End post-Covid, as “the classic symbol” of elaborate initiatives that cost a lot of money and haven’t worked, but also, at the eastern end of Oxford Street, “what’s called the Soho Photography Quarter” which has “one building and a few banners stuck” up and “£3 million quid’s worth of paving that was a complete waste of money. We need to do things that are worth it”.

He was hopeful that the Labour administration elected in May, the first in Westminster’s history, will bring improvements, while recognising the vastness of the task it faces, saying he counted “at least 50 empty units” when walking along Oxford Street recently. Yet he also sensed “an opportunity coming up” for change of a good kind.

Of course, there were varying definitions of what kind of change is good. Corsi was positive about some aspects of “an evolution” in the types of brands being drawn to Oxford Street and the range of uses its buildings are being put to, substantially in response to changes in high streets and working habits that were already taking place, but which Covid sharply accelerated.

She mentioned the branch of IKEA due to open in the Oxford Circus former home of Top Shop next year and, speaking of the West End more generally, noted new entertainment ventures such as the Outernet on Charing Cross Road, close to Tottenham Court Road station, and the repurposing of the ground floor spaces of clothing stores as restaurants. “People aren’t just coming to buy products, they’re coming for experiences,” she said. “With the pandemic we’ve seen that more people are actually craving that.” She sees the redevelopment for mixed use of the Debenhams and House of Fraser department store buildings as positive evidence of a desirable “additional diversity”.

Murray was less enthusiastic about the amount of development going on, as he has been in respect of the West End in general for some time. “I get that the West End is an economic powerhouse,” he said, and argued that its residents “have a crucial part to play in the attractions and the success of the centre of London”. However: “The construction boom and the concentration of property values and so on, that has a downside.” He applauded Barraclough for wanting the Marble Arch branch of Marks & Spencer to be retrofitted rather than demolished – a vivid case study of a much wider debate – and also appealed for more meaningful involvement of residents in development and other big decisions.

An emphasis on addressing residents’ concerns was an important feature of Labour’s historic election win, and Barraclough was sympathetic to quality of life issues Murray raised. “There are 45,000 people who live within 15 minutes walk of Trafalgar Square,” he said. “We’d like more people in the centre of town. But to have that you need an environment where they can get a good night’s sleep not walk out of their home to find someone pissing in their doorway.”

Murray also stressed the need to deal with the area’s stubborn and complex transport problems of various kinds. “How much traffic is there, what sort of traffic is it? We don’t really know,” he said. “I think the council is looking to improve that sort of data. It has to take responsibility, because it has ramifications for everybody.” He also called for a clear definition of what “essential traffic” is and for a recognition that although “we all want more cycling”, a lot of residents are “pretty negative about cycling” because of the behaviour of some cyclists.

The discussion underlined that finding the right blend of priorities for a changing West End is an exacting but intriguing challenge. Corsi outlined a vision of “a repurposed West End, a mix of business, services and experiences to attract our workers and visitors”. Murray questioned the desirability of “a 24-hour city the way some people have envisaged it”, contending that this would mean “saying goodbye to ordinary mixed residential communities, and that’s not right”.

Is it possible to nurture a West End that is more tranquil, more productive and more attractive all at the same time?Academics at University College London have been exploring different scenarios for the West End’s future, but, said Barraclough, “No one’s yet shown me one that suggests we can have our cake and eat it”. Yet he also remarked: “We discovered through the pandemic that the various components of our central London economy – offices, culture, hospitality, retail and the residents – all reinforce each other. If any one of them is not firing on all cylinders then we have a problem.”

The search is on for the right blend, the best compromises and the shrewdest initiatives to harmonise all elements of the West End’s unique and shifting ecosystems. The discussion provided plenty of food for thought – and subjects for On London to write about in the coming months.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: News

Alexander Jan: If London is to lead the charge for growth it needs investment and devolved powers

The so-called fiscal event of last Friday has largely been rounded upon – and not just by the markets.  The Institute for Fiscal Studies, a respected think tank which is usually pretty mild mannered in its observations, commented that “no attempt has been made to make the public finance numbers add up” and that “the plan seems to be to borrow large sums…put government debt on an unsustainable rising path, and hope that we get better growth.” Even the Daily Telegraph had columnists saying “doomster” Rishi Sunak was right to warn about Trussonomics.

The markets’ reaction has been dramatic. Analysis by Bloomberg estimates that 50 billion dollars – yes, billion – or these days pounds has been wiped off UK debt and equity markets since Liz Truss came to power. And this could be only the beginning. Some, including Mark Littlewood of the Institute of Economic Affairs, see the Chancellor’s statement as the first move in a much wider game of “economic chess”.

But what, if anything, does the government’s relentless focus on growth mean for London? As sharp-eyed pundits have noticed, it is the first time in a long while that London has been mentioned in a major ministerial speech in a way positive way. Policy impacts went much further.

Whatever one thinks of the plan to revive bankers’ bonuses, the Chancellor was prepared to talk about encouraging business to come to London rather than settle in Frankfurt, Paris, or New York. Then there was the (widely welcomed) commitment to restore tax-free shopping. Because London is the centre of international aviation and much high-end retail, this change will help London and its high streets more than other places.

With respect to changes in personal taxation, analysis by the Resolution Foundation indicates that those living in London and the South East will see over three times the gain of those living in the North East, Wales or Yorkshire. This is before changes to stamp duty are taken into account – £6,300 for the first-time buyer in London versus no gain in the North East of England.

The Chancellor’s advisors will have found it hard to miss that any pro-growth shift needed to focus on Zone 1 in particular. They will have worked out that central London and Canary Wharf together account for around 11% of UK economic activity from just 0.01% of the UK’s land mass, and generate nearly 20% of all business rates. And they will have seen that in a good year, such as 2019, London provided a fiscal surplus to central government of some £40 billion.

What should our collective response be to this major change in policy?

London government and business should together identify and champion policies and projects that are important for Londoners and the future of the city, and which deliver growth for the government. These include fiscal devolution, enabling, the very least, a larger proportion of the growth in property tax yields in London to be retained by the capital’s local authorities. This would provide a powerful local incentive for councils to support growth, as it would give them additional resources to improve public services for their residents.

Stalled plans for Crossrail 2 and an extended Bakerloo Line should be reactivated. Both of these projects could facilitate a major boost in housebuilding and regeneration. With borough and business support, a carefully drawn “enterprise corridor” running from Marble Arch through Oxford Street and Holborn to Liverpool Street could be developed. This would tackle the high vacancy rates and the “sweet shop problem” at street level and make the most of the Elizabeth Line’s potential for supporting a boost in economic growth and employment.

Consciously or otherwise, being more pro-London marks a major shift in government thinking yet also, ironically, signals a return to a Treasury orthodoxy which regards the City and London more generally as a source of fiscal surplus to be spent elsewhere in the country. The goose that lays the golden eggs has, however, not always been well fed. This time we must ensure that it is.

On London strives to provide more of the kind of  journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for just £5 a month. You will even get things for your money. Details here.

Categories: Comment