Blog

Government, Mayor and boroughs pledge to work together on London’s recovery

City Hall has announced the formation of two new multi-government bodies to help London emerge from the lockdown and plan its long-term recovery from the damage done by the Covid-19 outbreak

A London Transition Board co-chaired by London Mayor Sadiq Khan and housing, communities and local government secretary Robert Jenrick will be put in place until the end of this year to co-ordinate the capital’s efforts to re-open its economy while preventing any renewed flare-up of the coronavirus.

City Hall says the transition board will comprise “senior leaders from across the city and provide strategic direction for the next phase of response and restart” and focus in particular on infection control, “phasing in and out of varying levels of lockdown” and the effects on “public services, such as transport”.

The Mayor says the board will “bring together local government, civil and civic society, faith organisations, business, unions and Londoners themselves to reshape London as a city that remains open, safe and attractive for Londoners, visitors and investors.” Jenrick said the board will “carefully build on the extensive planning already underway to get life and business in London safely back on track.” 

A London Recovery Board will be formed by the Mayor and London Councils, which represents the capital’s 33 local authorities, to “plan and oversee the capital’s wider economic and social long-term recovery”.

Chaired by the Mayor and London Councils chair Peter John, it will function in parallel with the transition board and continue its work into 2021. Minister for London Paul Scully MP will attend its meetings on behalf of the government.

City Hall says the recovery board will “plan and oversee the capital’s wider economic and social long-term recovery, developing a strategy and plan of action to reshape London to be fairer, more equal, greener and more resilient than it was before the crisis” in a context where the impacts of the virus have created “an opportunity to reimagine our city and define our aspirations and priorities for the recovery effort”.

The Mayor has been a member of a government sub-committee for London, chaired by Jenrick. It is not yet clear how the founding of the London Transition Board will affect the Strategic Co-ordination Group of London public bodies and others, formed from the capital-wide London Resilience Panel and chaired by City of London chief executive John Barradell, which has been pulling together the threads of the capital’s response to the virus so far.

The two new boards are being set up against a backdrop of tension between national and London government, with the former stepping in to take closer control of Transport for London as a condition of its £1.6 billion bailout and Mayor Khan’s fierce criticism of the terms of the arrangement, and Jenrick using his powers to demand substantial changes to Khan’s proposed new London Plan, the over-arching blueprint for the city’s spatial development.

London’s local authorities remain unhappy over what they see as Jenrick’s failure to honour promises to compensate them in full for extra spending and loss of income incurred due to the impacts of the crisis, with some privately reporting widening budget gaps. On London understands that Hackney Council, for example, calculates it is on course to be £71 million out of pocket even after receiving its shares of extra government support. Pressure to provide the London boroughs with further funding compensation can be expected to continue.

On London.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

Categories: News

St Paul’s Cathedral launches online remembrance book for Covid-19 deaths

After the lockdown took effect, a lonely sign appeared before the steps of St Paul’s. It said that for reasons of public safety the cathedral had closed, although its ministers were “continuing worship and pray on behalf of all”. The sadness of that sight was compounded by the fact that not many people would be on the streets to see it.

But now, the management of London’s most vaunted place of Christian worship is going about its business in a public way again, albeit (in more than one sense) remotely. The cathedral has launched an online book of remembrance for all those across the country who have died as a result of Covid-19.

Entitled Remember Me, it is intended as a memorial to all those whose lives have been taken by the virus in the United Kingdom.

From today, the families, friends and carers of those who’ve died may submit to the Remember Me website the name and photograph of the person they have lost, together with a short message in their honour. The offer is made to people of all religious faiths and none, and is free of charge.

The cathedral’s choristers have recorded an accompanying Mendelssohn anthem, Prince Charles has recorded a video message and so has the Dean, the Very Reverend David Ison, who reminds us that, “For centuries, St Paul’s Cathedral has been a place to remember the personal and national impact of great tragedies, from the losses of war to the devastation of the Grenfell Tower fire.”

The project is being supported by the Dorfman Foundation, established by businessman and philanthropist Sir Lloyd Dorfman in 2007.

On London.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories: Culture

London Tory challenges Sadiq Khan over family-size homes policy

Sadiq Khan has been accused by a Conservative member of the London Assembly of letting down Londoners in overcrowded housing, as the Mayor used his first Question Time session since before the coronavirus lockdown to highlight “record” numbers of affordable homes started in the capital in 2019/20.

Citing figures from the Resolution Foundation showing significant overcrowding in the capital – 16 per cent, or one in six families living in such conditions – plus tweets from London Labour MP Karen Buck, Tory AM Andrew Boff clashed with Khan over City Hall support for family housing.

The Mayor’s housing strategy had scrapped targets for family homes, while the London Plan blueprint for new homes was encouraging developers to build small ones, said Boff. With some 370,000 children living in overcrowded households in the capital and social housing particularly overcrowded, it was time to “reinstate an investment target for family housing,” he told Khan.

But commitments on family housing in previous strategies had been “aspirations” only, Khan replied. “The previous Mayor’s strategy did not have a target for family-sized homes”, he said, while by contrast his draft new London Plan is “the first that requires councils to carry out an assessment of what their local needs are”, including housing size targets for the mix of social housing needed.

Wider targets for family housing would see more market rate housing provided, said Khan, but not the “affordable homes at social rents” needed by Londoners in overcrowded accommodation. He said that overcrowding in social housing was “down to the failure of successive governments to replenish the stock of social rented homes – with only one new home built for every five sold under Right to Buy provisions – while funding remained “disproportionately skewed” towards one or two bed “intermediate” housing, for sale or rent below market prices but above social rent levels. 

The Tory attack followed communities secretary Robert Jenrick’s recent toughly-worded rejection of Khan’s draft London Plan, in which he accused the Nayor of “driving people out of our capital when they want to have a family” and directed City Hall to beef up the Plan’s provisions for family-sized homes.

The Plan – focused on providing “good quality, genuinely affordable homes in greener neighbourhoods”, according to Khan, currently requires councils to set size requirements for “low-cost rent” homes, taking into account local need. Jenrick’s directions  would require boroughs to have specific regard generally to “the need for additional family housing” when determining all applications.

The stand-off over the Plan continues, with City Hall officials currently in discussion with Whitehall to agree a final version. “The Mayor is committed to moving ahead with his new London Plan as quickly as possible to give much-needed certainty to the construction industry and to deliver the good growth Londoners deserve,” a City Hall spokesman told On London this week. “It is up to the secretary of state to agree to the publication of the final version”.

Discussions with government are also focused on the need for additional funding for affordable housing, Khan told Assembly Members.  “It is likely the demand for social rent homes will grow,” he said. “The government should use this awful crisis and a potential recession to properly fund council housing.” 

New figures showed more than 17,000 affordable homes started in London in 2019/20, he added, with 7,000 for social rent including more than 3,300 council homes – the most in any year since 1982. “Over the past three years we’ve broken record after record for the amount of genuinely affordable homes available for Londoners,” he said. “That’s the way to meet the needs of those families who desperately need decent-sized homes.”

Photograph of house in Hammersmith by Omar Jan.

On London.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

 

Categories: News

Sadiq Khan to consider using powers to make face coverings compulsory on public transport

Sadiq Khan has today raised the possibility of using his mayoral powers to make the wearing of non-medical face coverings compulsory on Transport for London public transport services.

Mayor told London Assembly Members (AMs), “We are reviewing what’s happening in London in relation to voluntary wearing of non-medical facial coverings,” adding that “next week I will be considering whether I need to use the option I’ve got to make it mandatory.”

Khan has been advocating the voluntary use of face-coverings for more than a month in situations where social distancing is difficult, such as on buses and trains. Ten days ago the government changed its guidance to suggest they should be used on public transport and in some shops.

He was answering a question from Labour AM Andrew Dismore, who claimed the government had “refused” to make their wearing compulsory and pointed out that the necessary changes to “conditions of carriage” – the rules applied to public transport passengers – could be changed “pretty quickly”, as with the smoking ban that followed the 1987 King’s Cross fire and Boris Johnson’s 2008 ban on consuming alcohol.

Dismore said enforcement of such a rule would be “as much by peer pressure from other passengers as anything else,” but that this would be “strengthened if there was a legal requirement”.

Khan underlined that not all public transport services in the capital are under mayoral control, notably those of Network Rail, and warned of the danger of passenger confusion. “When there is a crisis what’s important is to have message clarity,” he said.

The Mayor added: “I’m hoping that we can work collegiately with the DfT [Department for Transport] and the government to reach a sensible compromise. What I want is a consensus around this issue. I’ll be speaking to colleagues in Scotland, Wales and across the country, and I will continue to try to lobby the government on this one. I leave the option available, which is to make it mandatory in London only, but I’m hoping we can persuade the government to do the right thing”.

Photograph by Omar Jan.

On London.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

 

Categories: News

Sadiq Khan accuses government of ‘punishing Londoners’ and ‘bad faith’ over TfL bailout

Sadiq Khan has accused Boris Johnson’s government of treating Londoners unfairly and showing “bad spirit and bad faith” over its financial rescue package for Transport for London, as arguments about strings attached to the £1.6 billion bailout continued at his monthly Mayor’s Question Time session (MQT).

Pointing out that the the emergency funding includes a £505 million loan element and a number of conditions, Khan said he is concerned that “we’ve been punished in a way others haven’t,” and urged the government to “reflect on their behaviour and ask themselves if this is the way to behave during a national crisis.”

The deal, concluded late Thursday afternoon, was followed this week by a parliamentary statement from transport secretary Grant Shapps in which he ascribed some of the blame for TfL’s budgetary problems to Khan’s stewardship over the past four years.

It has also sparked a political row in the capital over the Mayor’s recent announcement that the congestion charge, which has been suspended since 23 March as part of the coronavirus lockdown measures, will rise on 22 June from £11.50 per day to £15 and operate for longer hours for seven days a week, rather than the current five.

Conservative London Mayor candidate Shaun Bailey has described as “a lie” Khan’s saying that the forthcoming charge rise had been imposed on him by national government as a condition of the settlement, which is designed to keep TfL afloat until October. The government press release announcing the funding package said only that the congestion charge would be reinstated and Shapps’s subsequent statement said only that the Mayor had “announced” the coming increase.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Bailey, who is Tory AM, said “at no point did the government stipulate an increase in the congestion charge, only that it had to be reintroduced” and that it “be reviewed going forward”. The Conservative claimed it was “Sadiq Khan’s decision alone to immediately increase the charge by 30 per cent and also to expand the hours of its operation to seven days a week during this sensitive period for public health and the economy”.

Khan has refuted the accusation, reproducing a section of the as yet unpublished document detailing the funding package, which says conditions attached to it include the immediate reintroduction of the London Congestion Charge, along with the ULUZ and LEZ road pricing schemes, and “urgently bringing forward proposals to widen the scope and level of these charges”.

At MQT, which was conducted remotely, Bailey asked the Mayor to provide him with a copy of any congestion charge proposal, but Khan replied that there was no document of this kind and that there had as yet been no request from the government for him to go further with his changes to the charge: “If the government aren’t happy with the proposals, it’s open to them to say ‘we don’t like them’. So far, they’ve not said that. We think we’ve met their objective without the need for them to say we’re breaching the agreement with them.”

Bailey has previously drawn attention to a Guardian report saying a spokesperson for the Mayor had said “it was the Mayor’s decision” to increase the charge, though On London has learned that City Hall considers this a misrepresentation.

The full details of the bailout have yet to be published. Pressed to do so by Tory AM Tony Devenish, Khan responded that he is awaiting the government’s consent to do so. “I’m very happy for Londoners to see the very onerous conditions placed upon us,” he said.

Other conditions include restoring collection of bus fares, temporarily suspending free travel on all TfL services for Londoners aged over 60 and free bus travel for under-18s and increasing all TfL fares by RPI inflation plus 1 per cent from January. This will be in line with TfL’s current business plan assumption, but go further than the limited fares increases Khan said during the interrupted mayoral election that he would introduce if re-elected. The final decision on fares levels lies with the Mayor.

Asked by Labour AM Alison Moore if he thinks the government has yet to make the full bailout details public in order to “continue to make false claims about what you agreed to do”, Khan said he had made known he was unhappy with the deal, but “what I didn’t do was go running to the media as the government did on Thursday night and Friday morning, briefing [against me].” He also accused to government of “briefing aggressively” against the Scottish and Welsh governments.

Arup economist Alexander Jan has provisionally estimated that the congestion charge increase would make only a small contribution to closing the budget gap, saying “TfL would be doing amazingly well to net an additional £100 million per annum from the changes”.

OnLondon.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

Categories: News

John Biggs: The impact of Covid-19 on Tower Hamlets BAME residents must not be ignored

As Mayor of Tower Hamlets, one of the most ethnically diverse places in the country, I am particularly concerned about the disproportionate impact the coronavirus seems to be having on my BAME residents. Queen Mary University, which is based in Tower Hamlets, has analysed data from local GPs. These show that, when adjusted for age, the rate of suspected or confirmed Covid-19 is 1.9 times higher in our South Asian population and 1.6 higher in our black population than in our white population. These aren’t just statistics. They represent family members, neighbours and colleagues. I have represented this community for over 30 years and it’s personally devastating to see this impact.

It is, of course, a national issue too. The figures show that 35 per cent of coronavirus patients in critical care beds are from ethnic minority backgrounds while the UK’s BAME population is just 14 per cent. The situation among NHS staff is even more severe – over 60 per cent of those who’ve died have been from BAME groups. Millions of BAME people across the country are living with the fear that they and their families are potentially more susceptible to the effects of Covid-19 than others.

The government’s response to this situation has been disappointing. BAME communities deserve far more than an inquiry that kicks the issue into the long grass. If the government expects people to go back to work, it must also accept that we need to protect those most at risk. Having been too slow to wake up to the threat facing care homes, it must not make the same mistake by waiting for report that won’t appear for months. This is, literally, a matter of life and death. 

It is true that BAME residents are more likely to be in the kind of frontline jobs, such as with the NHS, that exposes them to the virus. At the same time, pre-existing health inequalities resulting in underlying health conditions can mean the virus having a disproportionate impact on these groups. We are told that the virus does not discriminate, but looking into these figures highlights that it’s about race and it’s about class. That’s something we can’t be shy about addressing. It means looking into what lies behind the statistics.

We will be working in partnership with Queen Mary as more findings emerge, and will continue to press the government on its response to the pandemic. I’m pleased that the new Labour leader, Keir Starmer, has asked Baroness Doreen Lawrence to look into this matter in her role as race relations advisor.

London’s councils understand the challenges our communities face and have been stepping in accordingly. In Tower Hamlets, we’ve done a lot of work locally to ensure that communications reach residents whose first language is not English, for example by launching a Bengali language e-newsletter, producing advice videos in various languages and translating Public Heath England adverts and advice. I have urged government to do more around this – it can’t be right that some people are excluded at a time when information about the virus is key. 

We’ve also worked with our diverse voluntary and community sector, which can reach people government initiatives simply can’t. We were told government would do whatever is necessary to support local government. Since then, it has rowed back on that commitment. Such signals from government concern me and we need to ensure that it listens. The disproportionate effect of the pandemic on our BAME residents can’t be swept under the carpet. We need to make sure the next steps towards recovery are taken together and don’t leave anyone behind. 

John Biggs is Mayor of Tower Hamlets. Follow him on Twitter.

OnLondon.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

Categories: Comment

London unemployed increase by a third as Covid hits east of city hardest

The number of Londoners actively seeking work had soared by 36 per cent two weeks into the lockdown compared with the figure for mid-February, official figures show.

Office for National Statistics data show that as of 9 April 300,000 people in the capital were recorded as benefit claimants actively seeking work, a rise of 110,000 compared with eight weeks earlier.

The government introduced full lockdown measures and its “stay at home” message from 23 March having earlier asked for a shutdown of most shops and many workplaces and introduced social-distancing requirements.

In percentage terms, the overall rise in the unemployment rate in London during the same – up 3.1 per cent to five per cent – is similar to the UK average, though some boroughs have seen steeper increase than others, particularly in the east of the capital.

Analysis by think tank Centre for London has found the greatest increases to have been in areas which had the highest claimant rates before the virus took widespread effect. Waltham Forest, Tower Hamlets, Havering and Redbridge in the east of the city are among those that have since the largest changes, along with Enfield in the suburban north.

Centre for London Research Manager Nicolas Bosetti says the disproportionate ill-effects in these boroughs “could be because their residents are more likely to work in occupations affected by physical distancing”.

Bosetti adds that other economic measures suggest London might be showing slightly greater resilience than the rest of the country, with the the number of jobs advertised plunging slightly less precipitously than in nearly all the rest of the UK, although the Greater London Authority has estimated that that the fall in economic activity in London will match the national average.

A GLA survey has found that around 30 per cent of Londoners had either lost their jobs, been furloughed or had their hours of work reduced due to the effects of the coronavirus. However, the same survey also found that 70 per cent of London businesses say they have continued trading and that 60 per cent of those believe they continue through the crisis.

Responding to the unemployment figures, Sadiq Khan said they showed that the situation “could get far worse unless sustained action is taken to support the economy”. Though welcoming the government’s extension of its job retention scheme, the Mayor argued, “It is far better for the Government go further to keep people in work now, than we see growing levels of unemployment, poverty and homelessness causing huge long-term damage to people’s lives. No options should be off the table to protect jobs and to stop people being pushed into poverty.”

Image from Centre for London. To see the think tank’s maps of the data in full, visit their website.

OnLondon.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

 

 

Categories: News

Boroughs join forces to purchase PPE London-wide

London’s boroughs have formed a capital-wide partnership to bulk buy personal protective equipment (PPE) for use in care homes and by providers of other key local services.

London Councils, the cross-party body that represents all 33 of Greater London’s local authorities, says the initiative will result in the distribution of more than 48 million PPE items “in the coming weeks”.

Shortages of PPE have been a huge concern for a number of boroughs since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak, leading to some borough leaders having to appeal to local schools and businesses to make up for shortages of supplies from national government.

The project, which is already underway, is an expansion of an established partnership by a group of seven west London boroughs under the name of the West London Alliance and is supported by the capital’s Strategic Co-ordination Group, which leads common action against the pandemic by boroughs, TfL, the Metropolitan Police and other public bodies.

The seven boroughs – Barnet, Brent, Ealing, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow – banded together through the Commissioning Alliance, a membership organisation that assists numerous London local authorities obtain what they need to help vulnerable residents.

The new, London-wide procurement system is being co-ordinated by officers of Haringey Council, with Ealing taking care of the supply. The scheme will run alongside the continuing national government programme but is essentially a move to compensate for its shortcomings. Last week, Birmingham Council expressed concern that PPE it had been given by the government was out of date.

The collaboration between the boroughs is thought to be the largest example yet of local authorities working together. Ray Puddifoot, London Councils’ executive member for health and care, who is also the leader of Hillingdon, praised boroughs for “acting quickly and decisively to boost PPE supplies and ensure equipment gets to those who need it most. London’s boroughs have stepped up to the plate and are playing a leading role in the capital’s response to the pandemic.” 

OnLondon.co.uk is doing all it can to keep providing the best possible coverage of  London during the coronavirus crisis. It now depends more than ever on donations from readers. Individual sums or regular monthly contributions are very welcome indeed. Click here to donate via Donorbox or contact davehillonlondon@gmail.com. Thank you.

 

 

Categories: News