A senior London Conservative MP has warned the government that its “levelling up” policies for other regions of the country should not be pursued “at the expense of London”.
Bob Neill, who represents Bromley & Chislehurst and co-chairs the all party parliamentary group for London, stressed in a House of Commons speech yesterday that “London is the economic powerhouse of the whole of the country, and if we harm London we damage everybody in the long run”.
He also reminded fellow MPs that the capital has “high levels of poverty” with pockets of it “even in comparatively affluent suburbs like mine” and he concluded: “We need to have levelling up within London as well as across the rest of the country.”
Neill’s speech was a wide-ranging contribution to a debate about Michael Gove’s Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill, in which he emphasised the importance of “proper devolution” for “levelling up and regeneration”. While praising the government’s enthusiasm for mayoral systems of regional government, he said “we ought to couple that with fiscal devolution”, citing Boris Johnson’s creation of the London Finance Commission when he was London’s Mayor and what Neill called its “many useful devolutionist but entirely pro-Conservative recommendations” published in 2013. The commission was re-convened by Sadiq Khan in 2016 and produced a further report the following year.
The “ability to raise more of their revenue locally,” would be essential for deeper evolution to make sense, Neill said, noting that “We have one of the most centralised local government finance systems in the western world – that does not make for healthy democracy.” On a related theme he argued that the “levelling up” legislation should not result in a reduction in “localism, that localist aspect to what we are doing” through any erosion of the importance of local planning frameworks, such as by housing targets being imposed from higher tiers of government “in a mandatory and rather arbitrary fashion”, which he said were “a particular problem in areas like suburban London”.
Neill said these problems “are magnified by the predatory attitude of the Labour Mayor of London towards suburban boroughs, where we are seeing unrealistic targets put upon boroughs like Bromley, much of which is green belt” while at the same time there is “much brownfield land in London, much of it publicly owned and unused for years”. Neill said “we really ought to have a proper ‘brownfield first’ policy as far as our urban areas are concerned.”
Watch the whole of Bob Neill’s House of Commons speech here.
On London is a small but influential website which strives to provide more of the kind of journalism the capital city needs. Become a supporter for £5 a month or £50 a year and receive an action-packed weekly newsletter and free entry to online events. Details here.
I first encountered Bob Neill in the early ’70s. We were on opposing sides, but I recognised him as a ‘liberal’ (small-l) Tory. Unfortunately his brand is out-of-favour in the modern Johnsonian mess that is Toryism.
What he says here is sane, sensible and to-the-point. He should be encouraged with such views: certainly there is little here with which I, or any other London-minded lefty, could disagree. Well, except for the self-serving bit about Bromley and the obligatory Tory kick at the Mayor.
As OnLondon repeatedly argues, ‘levelling up’ is no more than a slogan; and must not mean ‘levelling-down’ for London. What ought to concern us is the relative growth rates for UK regions.
The only two definitely positive post-CoVid regions are inner London and Northern Ireland: one is natural because of the failure of ten years of notional ‘levelling-up’; the other is a symptom of the cost of (the great unmentionable) #Brexit. Even the South-East, outside the capital is weak. Northern Ireland has the lowest rates of economic involvement, of hidden unemployment, of state employment, of productivity across the regions — so has furtherest to go. London is at the other end of those measurements.
If there are to be other major infrastructure builds in the near future (after Crossrail and HS2), one ought to be upgrading the east-west rail link from the Humber to the Mersey, thus linking the major cities from Hull to Leeds to Manchester to Liverpool. That one has been mooted for decades; but gets no further (and by comparison is that that expensive).
Where, then, does Bob Neill and his type stand on Crossrail2?