Vic Keegan’s Lost London 130: The abbey under the Mint

Vic Keegan’s Lost London 130: The abbey under the Mint

Two years ago, the government of China purchased the second most fortified building in London as the future new home for its embassy. The Royal Mint Court site stands opposite the Tower of London – the most fortified London building of all – on a site which, for hundreds of years, housed the Royal Mint, where most of the country’s coins were manufactured, hence the fortifications. And underneath it lie the extensive remains of London’s least known abbey. 

The particular monastery was dedicated to St Mary Graces, and used to be known as Eastminster to distinguish it from Westminster Abbey in the west. It was founded for the Cistercian order in 1350 by Edward III on the site of a notorious plague pit and fulfilled a vow Edward made to God and the Blessed Virgin Mary of Graces after his life had apparently been spared at sea.

If you walk around the block, starting at East Smithfield, turning left along Cartwright Street and left again along Royal Mint Street, you are walking around the space where the abbey was. Today, it is a case of “hunt the remains”. Excavations on the old Royal Mint site involving 150 people started in the 1980s. These revealed walls stretching to 76 metres surrounding a hospital, a dining hall, chapel, chapter house (where abbey business was discussed), a refectory and other buildings.

Screenshot 2020 02 15 at 10.34.53

To see the preserved remains today you need to seek permission from the building’s owner – which now seems unlikely to be granted, given who the new owners are – or make do with fuzzy glimpses from the pedestrian walkway (see photo above). 

The Museum of London says, rather sadly, in its book about the excavations: “Those lucky enough to see the remains…are unlikely to be able to identify them without prior knowledge. They are not signposted and do not feature in tourist guide books for either London or abbeys and monasteries.” It is a great shame that so many remains are hidden underneath new buildings in London, but at least they have been recorded and, in many cases, not destroyed.

For those interested in monasteries, this was an unusual one for the Cistercians, whose rules normally required their abbeys to be “far from the concourse of men” rather than on the edge of a city. It was the last Cistercian abbey built in Britain, but never attracted enough monks to make it a big success. 

After the dissolution of the monasteries in the late 1530s, the abbey passed into the hands of a knight who completely rebuilt it, as was the habit for those who profited from Henry VIII’s sequestrations.

All previous instalments of Vic Keegan’s Lost London can be found here. is dedicated to improving the standard of coverage of London’s politics, development and culture. It depends on donations from readers. Can you spare £5 (or more) a month? Follow this link if you would like to help. Thank you.



Categories: Culture, Lost London


  1. Chris Dixon says:

    I’d never heard of Eastminster until about a year ago, despite having a lifelong interest in East End history and actually living for a short while just a stone’s throw away in Mansell Street (when I now know I was walking past the site on an almost daily basis!). I tried to find out more about it but found very little information available, so your article makes very interesting reading.

    I’m still baffled as to why Eastminster isn’t more widely known!

  2. Mark says:

    Excellent site and book. Question :Where exactly was this photo taken. Walked past area last week visiting the UK and could not find it. Is it within the mint bldgs themselves?

    1. That is curious. It is the only photo I was able to take – and it was just by walking around the outside perimeter. Maybe the undergrowth has taken over – though one should be able to locate it from the stanchion in the top background.

  3. Victor Keegan says:

    I thought I had replied to this but it seems to have got lost. I am sorry you could not find that wall perhaps it was obscured by more undergrowth. All I did was to walk round the perimeter as you did. Maybe the clue is in that staunchon at the top of the picture. I will look next time I am near. Thanks for your comments.

  4. Mark says:

    Thanks for the reply, I should clarify I am in the United States and was visiting the site 3 weeks ago quickly. I was looking more around the actual Royal Mint Building as that is where I always heard the site was. Excuse my ignorance but are you talking more about the site that is behind the construction of 88 Royal mint Street?,+London+E1+8LG,+UK/@51.5101954,-0.0722647,3a,75y,341.88h,96.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s9Mwz5igBhbI-SPmkwxZ5nw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x4876034a19fba989:0xabf2124605eb4a89!8m2!3d51.5103776!4d-0.0714545!16s%2Fg%2F11r30zd86d

    1. Hi Mark

      I am not exactly sure where 88 Royal Mint Street is, but the area of archaeological study was bounded by Royal Mint Street, Cartwright Street, East Smithfield and Mansell Street.

      I hope this helps.


  5. Mark says:

    There was a link listed to the address in question. Or you can google it. It seems to be a site outside the mint itself with construction and possibly the background of your photo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *